Top posts

Featured Posts

MACC panelist under fire for defending Musa

MACC panelist Abdul Rahman Dahlan's credibility is now
under question after he openly defended Musa Aman over
the RM40 million political donation.
KOTA BELUD: Kota Belud MP Abdul Rahman Dahlan has been reminded that he sits on a Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC) panel and should not be too quick to jump and openly defend his Umno colleagues who are subject to corruption investigations.
Abdul Rahman sits on a MACC’s Special Committee on Anti-Corruption.
Last week he jumped to Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman’s defence over the RM40 million issue.
Commenting on this, Kota Belud State Reform Party (STAR) head Jalumin Bayogoh said Abdul Rahman’s defence of his party colleagues was an indication of a conflict of interest as he is supposed to help expose corruption and propose ways to strengthen approaches to stamp out graft and power abuses in the country.
“Last week he was very quick to defend the embattled Chief Minister Musa Aman, who is a subject on the still hotly-debated RM40 million issue, when he (Abdul Rahman) was never known to expose corrupt acts within the Barisan Nasional government.
“He might have compromised his position in the the special committee on graft which was established under the MACC Act. Moreover the the Swiss authorities are still investigating the Musa Aman matter,” Jalumin said.
Abdul Rahman had defended the government’s position in “clearing” Musa, saying that the RM40 million – being a political donation – was not Musa’s personal money but belonged to Sabah Umno.
He also accused the opposition of continuing to spin the issue after Malaysia’s authorities considered the case settled.
“What is the core business of Umno? It is a contribution from people for political activities. There is no law against anyone contributing money to political parties as long as they are accounted for.
“If I had RM1 billion and I like you and I gave you RM2 million, so what? As long as a receipt is given,” Abdul Rahman had said.
Abdul Rahman who is also Sabah BN secretary, challenged the opposition parties to reveal their own source of funding, saying they have not been transparent on theirs.
“Reveal your sources of income, how much have you collected from your donors. I have seen how Anwar (Ibrahim) in Permatang Pauh by-election threw money around,” he charged.

‘Chia was never arrested’
Asked about the claim by opposition parties that the RM40 million amounted to ‘foreign money’, Abdul Rahman reportedly said:” This is ridiculous, they are just having fun accusing Umno of everything.”
Last Thursday, Parliament was told that MACC had cleared Musa of graft and money-laundering allegations after finding that the over S$16 million (RM40 million) carried by businessman Michael Chia in Hong Kong in 2008 was not meant for the chief minister’s personal use but for Sabah Umno liaison body.
“It is not for the private use of the the chief minister,” Nazri said in a written reply to Batu MP Tian Chua.
The minister had also said the Attorney-General’s Chambers had shelved the matter after finding “no element of corruption” in the case.
Nazri’s reply also stated that the Hong Kong ICAC took no further action in the case after the MACC finding, while the request for cooperation in a criminal matter lodged over the Swiss bank account has been withdrawn for the same reason.
Earlier this year, Sarawak Report published documents purportedly from the ICAC that showed that a Swiss bank account in the name of a lawyer in Sabah contained some US$30 million (RM92 million) and was allegedly being held for Musa.
The report claimed that a paper trail showed that millions in euros, US dollars, Hong Kong and Singapore dollars were channeled from several firms to a number of British Virgin Island companies and subsequently to the Swiss account.
The transactions were believed to have been managed by Hong Kong-based timber trader Chia who was later arrested and charged with money laundering after attempting to smuggle S$16 million (RM40 million) back to Malaysia.
(On Aug 14, 2008, Chia, was caught red-handed at the Hong Kong International Airport with Singapore currency worth RM40 million in his luggage before be could board a flight to Kuala Lumpur)
However yesterday Nazri made yet another eye-opening remark in Parliament, claiming that Chia was never arrested by the ICAC in Hong Kong as was reported.
While Malaysia and Hong Kong are reportedly not pursuing the matter anymore from last week, the authorities in Switzerland are still investigating the case for money-laundering.
A powerful NGO, Bruno Manser Fund (BMF), is pressing for full investigations and is hoping that the famous Swiss banking secrecy would be lifted during a full investigation.

178 comments:

  1. What we know that MACC do their responsibility to investigate and announce the report. So the report stated that no corruption element in this accusation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed this matter ws already cleared MUSA of tihese false allegations against him

      Delete
    2. So mean this not this true rumour about Datuk Mus Aman.

      Delete
    3. If we see before this issued just created by opposition to attract supporter.

      Delete
    4. Memang isu ini sebenarnya rekaan semata-mata oleh pihak pembangkang.Sekarang terbongkar yang mana isu ini tidak benar sama sekali.

      Delete
    5. Jika kita lihat sendiri pun masih tidak ada bukti yang dikeluarkan oleh pembangkang untuk mendakwa kebenaran mereka ini.

      Delete
    6. Memang kita tidak dapat nafikan kalau ICAC yang ikut campur dalam hal ini. Kerana ICAC adalah suruhanjaya rasuah yang paling tegas di Dunia ini.

      Delete
    7. Jadi sudah pastilah kita percaya yang mana jika ICAC yang ikut campur pasti isu ini tidak ada menyebelahi mana-mana pihak.

      Delete
    8. Kalau ada pihak yang meragui kebolehan ICAC maka boleh datang dan tanya sendiri dengan ICAC mengenai perkara ini.

      Delete
    9. Kita patut berterima kasih kepada SPRM atas siasatan yang dilakukan. Ini membuktikan tidak ada kebenaran dalam tuduhan kepada Kerajaan BN ini.

      Delete
    10. Ada pihak yang kurang senang dengan keputusan tersebut dan cuba untuk mengelirukan rakyat dengan memutar belitkan cerita mengenai perkara ini.

      Delete
    11. Susah untuk kita percaya dengan apa yang pembangkang cuba katakan. Kerana kita sendiri pasti inginkan bukti untuk semua ini.

      Delete
    12. ACTING IMPARTIALLY - MALAYSIA BOLEH STYLE!

      Delete
    13. MACC sudah habis buat siastan

      Delete
    14. Laporan siasatan tidak dapat diterima sebilangan golongan.

      Delete
    15. DOn't think ICAC has need to respond to Rafizi.

      Delete
    16. If the SPRM said there is no elements of corruption, will they re-open the case?

      Delete
  2. And MACC cleared Datuk Musa from corruption to. Datuk Musa already stated that he don't had business with Micheal Chia. So mean MACC do with honestly and MACC cooperation with ICAC to do this investigate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Now they are pointing fingers against MACC just based on false pretext and perceptions that was generated by the opposition.

      Delete
    2. Nampaknya Datuk Musa telah dibersihkan dengan pelbagai tuduhan rasuah.

      Delete
    3. Yeah this already announce by MACC that Datuk Musa is free from this case.

      Delete
    4. Kalau begitu apa yang dikatakan oleh pembangkang selama 4tahun ini cuma permainan politik semata-mata.

      Delete
    5. Memang tujuan Pembangkang untuk mengelirukan fikiran rakyat. Dengan memutar belit isu ini untuk kepentingan mereka sendiri.

      Delete
    6. rakyat perlulah memikirkan sebaiknya akan perkara sebegini. Jika tidak ada bukti rasanya tidak perlu untuk mempercayainya.

      Delete
    7. If MACC not proven that Musa is not guilty, ICAC already reporting the same too. Should respect and accept the fact.

      Delete
    8. rakyat pasti dapat nilai sendiri isu ini dengan baik dan tidak mudah dipengaruhi.

      Delete
  3. MACC is not the only anti-graft agency that responsible to investigate this case.. how about ICAC?? can you say that the ICAC credibility is also under question??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MACC based their conclusion of this matter from ICAC's findings. I DON'T SEE WHY THEY SHOULD NOT REFERVTHIS MATTER TO ICAC.

      Delete
    2. ICAC tidak akan menyebelahi mana-mana pihak yang didapati bersalah.

      Delete
    3. ICAC telah pun memberikan keputusan yang sama dengan SPRM mengenai kes ini.

      Delete
    4. Isu ini sebenarnya tidak ada element rasuah sebenarnya. Itulah yang dinyatakan oleh pihak berkuasa.

      Delete
    5. Mendapat sumbangan tidak bersalah dan tidak ada dalam undang-undang.

      Delete
    6. Sumbangan RM40m itu bukannya satu kesalahan dan bukan rasuah seperti apa yang dikatakan oleh pembangkang.

      Delete
    7. ICAC amat tegas untuk mencegah kes rasuah.

      Delete
    8. I trust ICAC already do the best for the case. No prejudice on the result too.

      Delete
  4. When opposition media used to make allegations of mismanagement and corruption against the BN government, they were regarded as the gospel truth by his fanatical followers. they postings were compulsory reading and even when they imaginations went ridiculously wild, there were enough stupid people who believed in they tales.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    1. Skandal Talamgate yang melibatkan transaksi hampir RM 1 Billion.

    2.Penduduk Selangor juga berhadapan dengan krisis air yang semakin hampir, terbaru Empangan Air Sg Selangor semakin kering dan sekarang hanya mencatat jumlah simpanan air sebanyak 52%, merosot sebanyak 48%.

    3. Skandal Pasir Selangor,

    4. Skandal PKNS,

    5. Skandal Yayasan Selangor,

    6. Skandal UNISEL

    7. Kecuaian pengurusan sampah di Selangor

    8. Rumah urut yang menajdikan Anwar, Khalid dan Ronnie sebagai pelupor industri seks dan rumah urut di Selangor.

    9. Geran Selangorku RM300 juta yang dipegang erat oleh MB juga semakin ketara dipertikaikan oleh rakyat.

    10. Lapuran Ketua Audit Negara sendiri menyatakan bagaimana TAWAS yang dibiayai oleh MBI Incorporated itu telah gagal kerana tidak diurus dengan sempurna.

    11. Janji-janji dalam manifesto pakatan Selangor 2008 bukan lah satu perjanjian

    12. Skandal bas mewah Khalid Ibrahim

    13. Rampas tanah pertanian

    14. Dan lain-lain yang suatu ketika sudah dibentang di DUN Selangor sebanyak 30 isu-isu semua

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  6. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    Nga Kor Ming came into power less than 49 days in Perak already gave out the state tailoring contract to his wife . Is this not the world fastest corruption after coming into power?

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  7. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    What about all the Selangor Local Council law contract all given to a list of PKR Lawyers ( exposed by Raja Petra ) , what about Selangor Sand Mining scandal after PR take over after Mac 2008 ? What about in Teoh Beng Hock Royale Commission of Selangor DAP Au Yong and Lee Kee Hiong corruptions ?

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  8. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    What about On 26 April 2012, Tony Tan, accompanied by Member of Parliament Tan Tee Beng reported Teresa Kok to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission and provided documentations that suggested mishandling of the donation funds. For example, half of the RM10,000 donation for the Single Parents NGO by a Sabah businessman, was allegedly channeled into party funds.

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    What about Malaysia Today blog dated Jan 6, RPK has alleged that Johan Taharin – the brother in law of PKR Deputy President Azmin Ali – has approached a developer who was encountering difficulties in getting state approvals with an offer to secure a project in exchange for a fee?

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  10. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    The list will just goes on and on right after Mac 2008 a list of PR leaders it hit with corruption issues and scandal compare to zero from MCA , MIC , GERAKAN , PPP and other component party in Barisan Nasional after Mac 2008. So is all this that I had just posted is not the facts or is just another illusion ?

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    On the other hand , it is PR supporters to chose to defend all the Pakatan Rakyat leaders who is hit with list of corruption. It was PR supporters that close their eyes and shut down their ears in all Pakatan Rakyat wrong doings.

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  12. Pakatan Rakyat corruptions not cleared yet and still under question

    when we talk about State Mismanagement. Tua Pek Kong temple is being demolished under Lim Guan Eng administration in Penang. What about Selangor Talam scandal? What about Indian temple being demolished under Pakatan Rakyat administration in Selangor? What about all the fake illusion promises and manifesto that Pakatan Rakyat had failed to fulfill in all their states ? What about Kedah the only chinese Pork Abotoir is being removed ? What about in Kelantan there a rule to impose on Buddhist Temple to follow Islamic structure after Mac 2008? The list just goes on and on. Is all those facts that I just stated is not facts or is just another illusion?

    Pakatan Rakyat leaders and supporters try to cover up their corruption scandals

    ReplyDelete
  13. Barisan Nasional do have their flaws , weakness and mistake but then what changes are we talking about if Pakatan Rakyat and STAR is as worst as Barisan Nasional in most aspect? Almost every single problems and weakness that you can find in Barisan Nasional it also do happen inside Pakatan Rakyat. When we shouted for UBAH/CHANGE it should be a slogan of changing from bad to good and not from bad to worst or just another same changes ( bad to bad ). Pakatan Rakyat should stop deceiving and manipulating the public with all the false information or lies..

    ReplyDelete
  14. Because the case is closed hence DARD dares to comment about the case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DARD is not the one who control the MACC.. if he wanted to defend Musa Aman, he will do so since 2008..

      Delete
  15. He is making statement on his capacity as bn backbencher.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. he is making a statement based on the truth as what has been found by ICAC and MACC investigation.. unlike opposition leaders who always making a statement based on their lies..

      Delete
  16. What is wrong with the opposition, its a normal practice for someone to defend others from his own pack...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. yup.. its a normal practice especially when the person named in the case already investigated by anti-graft agency and found there is no element of corruption..

      Delete
  17. Opposition is good in getting free publicity by voicing out small issue...pretty lame if u ask my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. its to cover their big issues like Talam, Falcon Jet, luxury bus and many more..

      Delete
    2. I think opposition is freely to voice out too. We should respect too as we are democracy country.

      Delete
  18. Teresa Kok Corruption & Personal Assistant ( MPSJ Councillor )obtain a bungalow lot at a huge discount and also a black Toyota Camry from one developer.

    Teresa Kok’s personal assistant by the name of Gary Chong “going around selling table to major developers in Selangor for a dinner at RM10,000 to RM20,000 per table”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. dunno why Pakatan supporters and their media/NGO not urge the government to form RCI to investigate this Teresa Kok corruption scandal..

      Delete
  19. On 26 April 2012, Tony Tan, accompanied by Member of Parliament Tan Tee Beng reported Teresa Kok to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission and provided documentations that suggested mishandling of the donation funds. For example, half of the RM10,000 donation for the Single Parents NGO by a Sabah businessman, was allegedly channeled into party funds.

    As we all know, DAP has previously held fund-raising events which generated numerous donations from the people. However, the proceedings of the funds are often undisclosed to the public, raising speculation on the recipient of these funds

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think such donation should be open and transparent to avoid any hanky panky transaction.

      Delete
  20. According to previous media reports, DAP Penang once sparked an “RM500 to RM50” controversy. During its 45th Anniversary Dinner, they pledged to donate RM3000 to 6 individuals from the poor, each of them receiving RM500 respectively. The next day, suspicions were raised as the 6 individuals received RM50 instead of the supposed RM500 as reported by the media reports

    ReplyDelete
  21. Pakatan Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak for failing to explain the issue on the planning of four projects worth almost RM37bil which were alleged to have been done without going through the open tender process.

    Azizan must take responsibility to explain the issue to the people

    ReplyDelete
  22. The allegation against Nga was that he had pressured councillors and Pakatan Rakyat representatives to accept his wife’s tailoring company Ethan & Elton Sdn Bhd to make their lounge suits in 2008.

    Documents purportedly showing communication between a City Hall department head and mayor were also circulated on the Internet, implying that the state government had requested for the tender be awarded to Ethan & Elton

    ReplyDelete
  23. Just after 42 days that the Perak BN State Government was defeated by the Opposition, this tailoring company was immediately set up amongst others by Nga Kor Ming’s wife, Wong Seow Ching to take advantage of the new opportunities that comes with a new state government under the DAP, PKR and PAS loose coalition in Perak then

    ReplyDelete
  24. Azmin Ali Brother Corruption

    Malaysia Today blog dated Jan 6, RPK has alleged that Johan Taharin – the brother in law of PKR Deputy President Azmin Ali – has approached a developer who was encountering difficulties in getting state approvals with an offer to secure a project in exchange for a fee

    ReplyDelete
  25. Corrupted PKR Lawyers

    PKR Vice-President Sivarasa has also organized dinners with developers and at least one dinner, developers decided to boycott because they know they will end up having to pay money

    ReplyDelete
  26. This lawyer, who projects himself as super clean, has also been accused by RPK of getting legal work from the PJ City Council. So have other PKR leaders like Surendran and Lateefe Koya. So has PKR councillor Derek Fernandez.

    It is well known in the legal fraternity that MPPJ has been ordered to give these lawyers legal work. These PKR scums talk about Selangor Capability, Accountability and Transparency (SELCAT) but we all know it’s a lot of bullshit

    ReplyDelete
  27. This lawyer, who projects himself as super clean, has also been accused by RPK of getting legal work from the PJ City Council. So have other PKR leaders like Surendran and Lateefe Koya. So has PKR councillor Derek Fernandez.

    It is well known in the legal fraternity that MPPJ has been ordered to give these lawyers legal work. These PKR scums talk about Selangor Capability, Accountability and Transparency (SELCAT) but we all know it’s a lot of bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  28. PKR Mat Suhaimi Shafiei, the State Assemblyman for Sri Muda, and PKR Amirudin Shari, the State Assemblyman for Batu Caves Corruption

    Both assemblyman set up a company and worked alongside another company called Double Dignity (M) Sdn Bhd to get illegal sand work contracts from state-owned Kumpulan Semesta Sdn Bhd (KSSB).

    ReplyDelete
  29. DAP Lee Kee Hiong & Au Yong Hian Wah Corruption

    This information and bank cheques is involving Lee Wye Wing of WSK Services.

    The four cheques is paid for DAP Serdang Aman by Sharideen Enterprise and Sharenna Enterprise.

    Sharideen Enterprise is a company set up on 7 July 2008 under the name of Muhammad Liwauddin b Zainal Abidin (No. KP 8704-23-5650-97). Muhammad Liwauddin is a factory worker. While, Sharenna Enterprise is company that started operation on 17 Oct 2008 and is registered under Mohd Jali. b Abdullah (IC No 5912-24-1064-51).

    ReplyDelete
  30. Lee approach them to register a company and promise to secure projects for them. They are offered 10% of contracts, the balance is to be paid to Lee. He will handle the projects and some projects are fictitous. The company must pay a certain amount to DAP Serdang Aman.

    The paperwork is handled by Lee and payment approval is by Ean Yong and/or Ronnie Liu. It is the same like how Teoh Beng Hock and Ean Yong process the fake invoice and the fake project paperwork and the money is paid by Selangor State.

    ReplyDelete
  31. DAP Sin Chewwwwwwwe Bribe ?

    The DAP has also used wang rakyat Selangor to pay to Sin Chew Media Corporation Bhd owner of Sin Chew Jit Poh newspaper. In just two months September 08 and December 08 there are two times payments made to Sin Chew. From the funds of one ADUN only

    ReplyDelete
  32. WONG CHUAN HOW (in the Kawasan DUN Sungai Pelek) under YB Ronnie Liu who was given 84 projects totalling over RM200,000 (Tarian Cina Persatuan Bahasa, Perayaan Persatuan Buddha Huan Chian Chuen, Kejohanan Bola Keranjang). Other names include Perniagaan Seri Makmur, Era Terbilang Enterprise, Era Gemilang Enterprise and many more. Teoh gave a full list. We have scanned some of the documents (from about 100 pages of documents)

    How can one person get 84 different contracts?

    The amounts are small but the method they use is very big. This is just in one year. Imagine if the DAP take over the federal govt?

    ReplyDelete
  33. many Pakatan Rakyat supporters who keep closing their own eyes on all Pakatan Rakyat weakness , flaws , mistake , fraud , scandals and problems. For them whatever wrong in Barisan Nasional will forever be wrong and whatever wrong in Pakatan Rakyat will forever be right...

    we MUST reject Pakatan and other opposition parties to save this country..

    ReplyDelete
  34. Corruption? Nga Kor Ming came into power less than 49 days in Perak already gave out the state tailoring contract to his wife . Is this not the world fastest corruption after coming into power?

    ReplyDelete
  35. It is ridiculous that Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng can sing the praises of Pakatan Rakyat but chooses to turn a blind eye towards the corruption within the Pakatan parties which is happening in the states under their control and tries to cover up the issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MCA President Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek has pointed out that there are elements of corruption in both Barisan Nasional as well as Pakatan Rakyat. This is an indisputable fact. However, Guan Eng tries to ignore the corruption within Pakatan Rakyat and continues to deceive himself that Pakatan Rakyat is clean, but everybody knows that beneath a clear river there are dirt and sediments on the riverbed which pollutes the river.

      Delete
    2. Guan Eng is naïve to believe that Pakatan Rakyat is free from corruption, but the fact is that he cannot accept the fact that corruption is prevalent. For example, in Kedah, Pakatan Rakyat representatives had asked for a 30% rebate on allocations to Chinese associations, proving that the Kedah Pakatan state government is guilty of corruption and abuse of power, but Guan Eng chose to ignore this issue.

      Delete
    3. Recently, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) had also reopened the case involving the Selangor sand mining scandal in 2009 where two PKR state assemblymen were suspected of receiving kickbacks from a sand mining contractor, and in Perak, there was a controversy surrounding a tailoring contract involving the wife of a state assemblyman. Both these examples prove that Pakatan Rakyat is not completely free of corruption.

      Delete
    4. Kelantan Menteri Besar Dato’ Nik Abdul Aziz is always portrayed as a godly man, but his state government is in a mess. Under his rule, Kelantan has imposed a theocratic Islamic state, making speeches which discriminate against women, prohibiting all activities considered unclean by Islam such as alcohol, gambling and forcibly separating for men and women. All these are elements of poor policy management and administration but yet Guan Eng still chooses to ignore these facts.

      Delete
    5. The opposition must be aware that people are not saints, but if they commit an error then they must own up and admit to being at fault. They should not be fooling around, using all sorts of tactics to get themselves into Putrajaya but should instead live up to the expectations of the people.

      Delete
  36. What about all the Selangor Local Council law contract all given to a list of PKR Lawyers ( exposed by Raja Petra ), what about Selangor Sand Mining scandal after PR take over after Mac 2008? What about in Teoh Beng Hock Royale Commission of Selangor DAP Au Yong and Lee Kee Hiong corruptions?

    ReplyDelete
  37. What about On 26 April 2012, Tony Tan, accompanied by Member of Parliament Tan Tee Beng reported Teresa Kok to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission and provided documentations that suggested mishandling of the donation funds. For example, half of the RM10,000 donation for the Single Parents NGO by a Sabah businessman, was allegedly channeled into party funds.

    ReplyDelete
  38. What about Malaysia Today blog dated Jan 6, RPK has alleged that Johan Taharin – the brother in law of PKR Deputy President Azmin Ali – has approached a developer who was encountering difficulties in getting state approvals with an offer to secure a project in exchange for a fee?

    ReplyDelete
  39. The list will just goes on and on right after Mac 2008 a list of PR leaders it hit with corruption issues and scandal compare to zero from MCA , MIC , GERAKAN , PPP and other component party in Barisan Nasional after Mac 2008. So is all this that I had just posted is not the facts or is just another illusion?

    ReplyDelete
  40. On the other hand , it is PR supporters to chose to defend all the Pakatan Rakyat leaders who is hit with list of corruption. It was PR supporters that close their eyes and shut down their ears in all Pakatan Rakyat wrong doings.

    ReplyDelete
  41. is there anything we can do...theres nothing much we can do...not us do the investigation....

    ReplyDelete
  42. Under fire for defending?

    ReplyDelete
  43. God has a plan, if Datuk Musa involved to the matter mention above..i am sure he will never get out from this and one day everything will be revealed...

    ReplyDelete
  44. report remain a report and we just cant change it...

    ReplyDelete
  45. there are many things changed in Sabah...u just cant deny it...can we see the changes if Datuk Musa did not do his job to develop Sabah?

    ReplyDelete
  46. why must we repeating the same issue? we discuss on something which i think seems to be no avail..

    ReplyDelete
  47. i wish the issue will not going to disturb datuk musa schedule as Sabah CM...

    ReplyDelete
  48. seems like difficult time to datuk musa...but be strong bcoz sabahans will always be with you..but dont ever ever betrays the people or else you wont stay in power..

    ReplyDelete
  49. The practice of jumping parties in politics was not uncommon but this would not affect BN's struggle to bring progress for the people.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Musa is a great leader with a great vision.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kepimpinan di bawah Ketua Menteri, Datuk Seri Musa Aman yang dinamik merupakan antara rahsia kejayaan Sabah mendapat pengiktirafan cemerlang iaitu Sijil Tanpa Teguran selama 12 tahun berturut-turut sejak tahun 2000 mene- rusi Laporan Audit Negara.

      Delete
  51. Musa also opined that Sabah in this regard, had a better composition of positive factors, compared to Dubai, and there was no reason to not do better than the Emirate, with commitment and the political will.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Chief Minister, Datuk Seri Musa Haji Aman has invited investors from Brunei to explore the economic potentials and prospects of the Sabah Development Corridor (SDC).

    ReplyDelete
  53. Musa described SDC as the gateway to trade, investment and tourism for all fields of businesses.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Don't Worry folks, with God will he will stay in power no matter what happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa Aman said among them was the enhancement of the support system, training and facility to get more contributions from women to boost the economy of the State and country.

      Delete
    2. Speaking at the Sabah Women's Day celebration at Magellan Sutera, Wednesday, he noted that women also had assisted in the State's development.

      Delete
    3. "In fact, women have a strong influence in the economy, social and politics of a country.

      Delete
    4. Therefore, the Women's Day celebrated annually marks the appreciation and recognition of the women's contribution, particularly in Sabah," he said.

      Delete
    5. Musa said the theme "Women Catalyst of New Economy" clearly showed the government's high hope on the capability of women to contribute towards making Malaysia a developed and high-nation income by 2020.

      Delete
    6. He said the capability of women in leading various departments and corporate companies was proof that they too can do it if given the opportunity.

      Delete
  55. The State Government continues to provide attention and its commitment through various initiatives to ensure women continue to have their role and opportunities to explore and create new wealth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In this respect, he said various incentives had been introduced in the National 2013 Budget for the benefit of women.

      Delete
    2. "I support the call by the Prime Minister for more child care centres to be built in workplaces.

      Delete
    3. "On behalf of the State Government, we have already taken the initiative through the Community Development and Consumer Affairs Ministry to set up a Taska (childcare centre) in Wisma Muis this year for the convenience of parents working in nearby departments," he said.

      Delete
    4. He was also made to understand several places like in Wisma Pertanian and Wisma Perindustrian had also been identified for a similar purpose.

      Delete
    5. Musa who is also Finance Minister congratulated all the recipients of this year's Women's Awards and hoped they continue to contribute for the betterment of Sabah in the years to come.

      Delete
    6. Meanwhile, Musa presented the 2012 Tokoh Wanita Award to Dr Hjh Suzain Datuk Hj Suhaimi, a private practitioner, who also received a sash from the CM's wife, Datin Hjh Faridah Hj Tussin.

      Delete
    7. The award carries with it a trophy, a cheque for RM10,000, a certificate and special gifts.

      President cum Chief Executive Officer of Harbour City, Eliza Goh won the Excellent Woman Award (a trophy, a cheque for RM5,000, a certificate and special gifts.

      Delete
    8. The Most Outstanding Women Organisation Award went to Perkep (Association of Police Families) Sabah Contingent headed by Datin Hjh Alauyah Mohd who is the wife of the State Commissioner of Police.

      She received a trophy a cheque for RM3,000 and a certificate.

      Delete
    9. The Most Outstanding Women Organisation Award went to Perkep (Association of Police Families) Sabah Contingent headed by Datin Hjh Alauyah Mohd who is the wife of the State Commissioner of Police.She received a trophy a cheque for RM3,000 and a certificate.

      Delete
  56. Opposition gimmick try to more publicity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sabahans still support Musa Aman as he bring development to Sabah

      Delete
  57. dah terang2 Musa tak bersalah dalam kes ini.

    ReplyDelete
  58. baik pembangkang pergi tanya ja dgn icac hong kong tentang kes ini untuk dptkan kesahihan.

    ReplyDelete
  59. jgn pula dah dpt kesahihan diputar belit lagi isu ni.. mcm kita tak kenal pembangkang,

    ReplyDelete
  60. sarawak report media paling byk buat penipuan.

    ReplyDelete
  61. sarwak report pernah memberi gambaran palsu tentang lembah danum. mengatakan lembah danum kawasan yg teruk dgn pembalakan. hakikatnya lembah danum adalah kawasan hutan dara yang terpelihara.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Sarawak Report sudah menasihatkan keluarga diraja Britain supaya membatalkan rombongan ke Lembah Danum, tapi malangnya tidak dilayan.

    ReplyDelete
  63. sarawak report tergamam apabila penipuannya terdedah,pasangan diraja britain, putera willian dan kate telah melawat lembah danum dan megiktirafnya sebagai kawasan pemulihraan terbaik.

    ReplyDelete
  64. sarawak report jg pernah di saman oleh taib mahmud kerana melakukan fitnah.

    ReplyDelete
  65. kini sarawak report byk memfitnah musa aman. sarawak report patut memohon maaf pada musa aman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Fitnah terbaru SR, mengaitkan Nazri dgn Chia pla.

      Delete
  66. PAS dan Subky Latif, tidak perlulah meragui keIslaman FGVH kerana sesungguhnya pihak yang mengurus FGVH juga cukup peka dengan halal-haram sesuatu urusan perniagaan. Jika ada yang terlepas pandang atau kurang jelas, sama-samalah diperbetulkan bukan difitnah atau dijatuhkan kerana yang akan rugi nanti adalah orang-orang kita juga, orang Islam, orang Melayu yang menjadi majoriti peneroka Felda.

    ReplyDelete
  67. apa yang jelas haram atau dosanya di sini ialah tindakan menuduh dengan niat memfitnah terhadap orang lain seperti apa yang dilakukan oleh Subky Latif, Harakahdaily dan PAS

    ReplyDelete
  68. Saham FGVH adalah bertepatan dengan syariah berdasarkan prospektus dan setakat ini, tiada pemegang saham atas nama Genting yang direkodkan.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Bagaimanapun, jika Genting yang membeli saham sepatutnya bukanlah satu isu tetapi yang sepatutnya menjadi isu ialah jika FGV yang membeli saham judi Genting. Tetapi ini tidak pernah dan tidak mungkin berlaku selagi ia dipantau oleh kerajaan yang didominasi oleh orang Islam.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Lainlah jika Pakatan Rakyat yang menjadi kerajaan serta Anwar Ibrahim yang membawa fahaman pluralisme menjadi Perdana Menteri dengan DAP menjadi tulang belakangnya, maka mungkin sesuatu seperti itu boleh berlaku.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Dengan itu, Subky harus ingat bahawa bukan dia sahaja yang Islam di Malaysia ini. Orang-orang UMNO, majoriti peneroka Felda dan pengurusan FGVH juga Islam. Bezanya, satu pihak gemar mempertikai iman dan ilmu agama orang lain dan satu pihak lagi tidak. Itu saja.

    ReplyDelete
  72. We were told that MACC did their part as a responsibility to investigate this issue.

    ReplyDelete
  73. It seems like this matter is getting really out of hand, deeper and complicated.

    ReplyDelete
  74. The opposition will never let go after all.

    ReplyDelete
  75. I thought there is no corruption element as accused.

    ReplyDelete
  76. The opposition are definitely getting supporters out of this.

    ReplyDelete
  77. It is getting confusing day by day as this issue is not true at all

    ReplyDelete
  78. We are aware that ICAC is the most decisive corruption commission in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I suggest they should question MACC about the result of their investigation, if not satisfied.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Is there anyone who is not satisfied with MACC's investigation?

    ReplyDelete
  81. It is obvious now there is no truth in the allegations to the state government.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Some people out there are not happy with the decision made.

    ReplyDelete
  83. I can see the opposition are simply trying to distort the story about this matter.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Well it is hard to believe what the opposition is trying to say.

    ReplyDelete
  85. The investigation made is not to favor any party.

    ReplyDelete
  86. I suppose the opposition do make contributions too...

    ReplyDelete
  87. Keputusan tidak memihak pembangkang, itulah mereka bising.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Kes ini sudah tamat melainkan jika da bukti baru.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Ke sini akan berlanjutan, pembangkang dapat kesan lebih banyak bukti dan berkait dengan lebih banyak pihak juga.

    ReplyDelete
  90. kes sudah selesai..pembangkang saja yang tidak boleh menerima kenyataan.

    ReplyDelete
  91. pihak musuh terlalu banyak muslihat untuk mahu menjatuhkan Musa Aman

    ReplyDelete
  92. Semakin hampir PRU semakin terdesak pembangkang.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Ketiadaan atau kekurangan bahan bukti selepas 16 tahun isu ini dimainkan cukup untuk membuktikan bahawa Datuk Musa Aman tidak terlibat dengan skandal pembalakan atau skandal pengubahan wang haram sebagaimana yang dimomokkan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang dan juga NGO tajaan mereka.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Jika pemimpin-pemimpin pembangkang masih terus mendesak SPRM supaya membuktikan yang tidak bersalah sebagai bersalah, kenapa tidak desak SPRM untuk terus mencari bahan bukti bagi kes RM4 bilion Jeffrey Kitingan dan skandal SAS Datuk Yong Teck Lee?

    ReplyDelete
  95. atau mungkin MP PAS Kubang Kerian Salahuddin Ayub sendiri perlu arahkan pihak polis untuk terus mencari bahan bukti bagi kes liwat Anwar sekalipun perbicaraan kes itu sudah selesai.

    ReplyDelete
  96. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

    Penguatkuasa anti-rasuah Hong Kong menulis secara peribadi kepada Datuk Musa Aman pada Disember lepas untuk memaklumkan Ketua Menteri Sabah itu bahawa beliau tidak lagi disiasat untuk tuduhan rasuah RM40 juta

    Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Dalam surat pada 22 Disember 2012, Suruhanjaya Bebas Pencegahan Rasuah (ICAC) menjelaskan kepada ketua menteri itu mereka memulakan siasatan selepas menerima aduan terhadapnya, sambil menambah bahawa ini dikehendaki oleh undang-undang Hong Kong berkenaan dengan rasuah

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    2. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Tetapi agensi itu berkata bahawa selepas melengkapkan siasatan dan memfailkan laporan kepada Jawatankuasa Semakan Operasi (ORC), kedua-dua jawatankuasa dan Pesuruhjaya ICAC bersetuju untuk tidak meneruskan lagi penyiasatan “di atas asas fakta sudah diketahui”.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    3. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Surat, yang menggunakan kepala surat ICAC, ditandatangani oleh Ketua penyiasat Tso Wai-Yan dan ditujukan kepada Musa di alamatkan ke pejabat beliau di Kota Kinabalu. Tiada individu lain diberi salinan dokumen itu.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    4. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Setiausaha BN Sabah Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan menunjukkan kepada The Malaysian Insider gambar surat tersebut daripada iPad, sambil berkata satu halaman surat-menyurat boleh mempertahankan Musa dan Umno terhadap dakwaan daripada pemimpin pembangkang mengenai skandal tersebut menjelang pilihan raya akan datang.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    5. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Abdul Rahman menegaskan bahawa surat itu adalah peribadi dan sulit kerana ianya hanya ditujukan kepada Musa, menunjukkan bahawa agensi telah bertindak secara bebas tanpa sebarang gangguan dari pihak luar.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    6. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      “ICAC profesional. Tiada seorang pun diberikan salinan surat tersebut. Mereka menghormati hak tertuduh untuk kerahsiaan,” Abdul Rahman memberitahu The Malaysian Insider.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    7. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Ahli parlimen Kota Belud pada mulanya berjanji untuk mendedahkan surat pada sidang akhbar Khamis lepas tetapi berkata bahawa nasihat daripada peguam, salinan fizikal dokumen akan disimpan buat masa sekarang dan digunakan sebagai “senjata” Umno Sabah untuk membuktikan Musa tidak bersalah.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    8. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Beliau berkata, Ketua Menteri dan Umno Sabah sedang memikirkan tindakan undang-undang terhadap pengarah strategi PKR Rafizi Ramli, yang kembali minggu lepas dari misi dua hari di Hong Kong untuk menggali maklumat mengenai kes Musa.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    9. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      “Saya berjanji untuk mendedahkan surat ini tetapi selepas membincangkan perkara itu dengan peguam bagi Ketua Menteri dan Umno Sabah, mereka menasihatkan saya supaya tidak mendedahkan ia kerana akan digunakan jika ada tindakan undang-undang terhadap Rafizi.

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    10. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      “Ia memang satu pilihan. Rafizi melanggar beberapa undang-undang,” kata Abdul Rahman.

      Sebagai contoh, ahli parlimen Sabah itu berkata bahawa selain daripada fitnah, Rafizi melanggar seksyen 29 (4) Akta Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) 2009 yang melindungi identiti seorang tertuduh.


      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
    11. Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Seksyen tersebut menyatakan laporan yang dibuat terhadap suruhanjaya tersebut, “hendaklah dirahsiakan dan tidak boleh didedahkan oleh mana-mana orang selain pegawai-pegawai Suruhanjaya dan Pendakwa Raya sehinggalah orang yang tertuduh dipertuduh di mahkamah atas suatu kesalahan dibawah akta ini atau mana-mana undang-undang bertulis lain berbangkit daripada aduan itu melainkan dengan persetujuan Pendakwa Raya atau pegawai berpangkat Pesuruhjaya keatas.”

      Surat ICAC bukti Musa Aman tidak bersalah

      Delete
  97. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

    Lihat betapa terburu-burunya Rafizi membuat kenyataan melalui artikel "Nama Musa Belum Dibersihkan Lagi" seolah-olah beliau tidak membaca langsung laporan portal Malaysian Insider (disini). Samada Rafizi tidak membaca langsung atau mungkin beliau tidak tahu membaca memandangkan banyak kenyataan beliau yang sudah disangkal namun masih terus diputar-putar bagi menegakkan pembohongan beliau.

    BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Dalam kenyataan tersebut, Rafizi juga mempertikaikan tindakan Datuk Rahman Dahlan yang bercakap bagi pihak Datuk Musa Aman. Namun Rafizi lupa yang beliau juga pernah bercakap dan menjawab kepada wartawan bagi pihak Anwar berhubung dengan tuduhan akaun RM3 bilion yang dikawal oleh Anwar.

      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    2. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Malah dalam kes itu Rafizi bukan setakat menjawab, malah bertindak sebagai Penyiasat Persendirian, dan tanpa segan silu mengumumkan kononnya hasil siasatan beliau mendapati tidak ada elemen rasuah membabitkan Anwar, sebaliknya beliau menuduh Abdul Murad yang memiliki akaun tersebut.

      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    3. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Rafizi - "surat Suruhanjaya Bebas Anti Rasuah Hong Kong (ICAC) mengenai kes RM40 juta melibatkan Ketua Menteri Sabah, Datuk Seri Musa Aman tidak membersihkan namanya dari skandal itu. Sebaliknya menguatkan pandangan bahawa ICAC terpaksa menghentikan siasatan kerana tidak mendapat kerjasama pihak berkuasa Malaysia."

      Laporan MI - "Penguatkuasa anti-rasuah Hong Kong menulis secara peribadi kepada Datuk Musa Aman pada Disember lepas untuk memaklumkan Ketua Menteri Sabah itu bahawa beliau tidak lagi disiasat untuk tuduhan rasuah RM40 juta"


      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    4. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Rafizi - “Surat itu hanya memaklumkan bahawa berdasarkan maklumat-maklumat yang ICAC perolehi setakat itu, ICAC mengambil keputusan untuk tidak meneruskan siasatan terhadap Musa,”

      Laporan MI - "agensi itu berkata bahawa selepas melengkapkan siasatan dan memfailkan laporan kepada Jawatankuasa Semakan Operasi (ORC), kedua-dua jawatankuasa dan Pesuruhjaya ICAC bersetuju untuk tidak meneruskan lagi penyiasatan “di atas asas fakta sudah diketahui”."


      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    5. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Rafizi - “jika Musa tidak bersetuju dengan fakta-fakta ini, maka wajarlah beliau mendedahkan kandungan keseluruhan surat tersebut, bukannya menggunakan Rahman Dahlan untuk menyampaikan secara lisan sahaja kepada wartawan.”

      Laporan MI - "Abdul Rahman menegaskan bahawa surat itu adalah peribadi dan sulit kerana ianya hanya ditujukan kepada Musa, menunjukkan bahawa agensi telah bertindak secara bebas tanpa sebarang gangguan dari pihak luar. ICAC profesional. Tiada seorang pun diberikan salinan surat tersebut. Mereka menghormati hak tertuduh untuk kerahsiaan."


      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    6. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Sudah banyak kali dijelaskan bahawa pegawai-pegawai ICAC sendiri telah datang ke Sabah untuk menjalankan siasatan terhadap pihak-pihak yang dinamakan dalam kes tersebut. ICAC adalah badan profesional yang tidak sekali-kali bergantung dengan maklumat pihak ketiga tanpa sebarang siasatan dijalankan dipihak mereka.

      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    7. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Jesteru, bagaimana Rafizi boleh berkata bahawa ICAC bergantung sepenuhnya kepada Peguam Negara dan SPRM sedangkan pegawai-pegawai mereka sendiri boleh jalankan siasatan di negeri ini tanpa sebarang sekatan? Jelas sekali Rafizi cuba menjejaskan imej ICAC dengan menimbulkan gambaran bahawa agensi itu hanya bergantung kepada laporan pihak ketiga semata-mata untuk melengkapkan siasatan.

      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete
    8. RAFIZI TIDAK MEMBACA LAPORAN MALAYSIAN INSIDER ATAU BELIAU MEMANG TIDAK TAHU MEMBACA (BUTA HURUF)?

      Sebagai badan profesional yang diperakui integriti dan kredibilitinya di peringkat antarabangsa, ICAC tidak akan semudah itu menutup mana-mana kes rasuah jika masih banyak persoalan yang belum terjawab atau dalam kata lain "diragui".

      BELAJAR TINGGI-TINGGI, TAPI TETAP JUGA BODOH..

      Delete

Search This Blog