Top posts

Featured Posts

Bersih Sabah stands firm on call to reject appointment of Herman Luping

Bersih Sabah spokesperson Andrew
Ambrose (also known as Atama)
KOTA KINABALU: Bersih Sabah stands firm on call to reject appointment of Herman Luping

Bersih Sabah is standing firmly on their recent call to reject the appointment of Tan Sri Herman Luping as one of the commisioners for the recently announced Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI).

In issuing a response to Tan Sri Bernard Dompok’s recent statement which suggested that Bersih Sabah are just trying to discredit the RCI, the members of the group would like to stress that the need for commissioners of integrity is paramount.
“Is there actually a point having RCI with great terms of reference (TOR) when you have commissioners and a secretary who are tarnished and bias?” questioned spokesperson of Bersih Sabah, Andrew Ambrose.

He further added that “Tan Sri Herman Luping is no doubt, a person who has contributed much to the state of Sabah. However, it is necessary to remind the government that one of the basic principles of natural justice is nemo iudex in causa nua, which literally translates to mean, ‘no one should be a judge in their own cause’.”

Such is the case with Tan Sri Herman Luping, who, in his vast experience, was the State Attorney General during PBS administration for year 1985 - 1986. He was even, at one point in time, a Deputy Chief Minister as well during the Usno-led Alliance Government (1967 - 1976).

Being a commissioner on the RCI would mean that he would be involved in the investigation of legality of the issuance of IC or granting of citizenships, and also the standard operating procedures (SOP) within the time frame of which he was serving in a very high position within the government. In short, he will be investigating his own administration.

Bersih Sabah therefore would like to ask a very important question to all the Sabahan leaders who agreed with his appointment: Can or would Tan Sri Herman Luping be impartial and independent in carrying out his duties in the RCI?

“We ask them to do the honourable thing and reject the appointment and recuse themselves before we have to openly highlight the problems. Any judge in the courts will have to recuse himself in such a biased scenario. This is what we expect of the proposed commissioners.” according to Andrew.

However, considering his experience and involvement, Bersih Sabah welcomes any contribution and suggestions on solutions and recommendations that may be given by Tan Sri Herman Luping should he wish to cooperate as not one of the commissioners. The movement also suggests that the RCI should call upon Tan Sri Herman Luping to be a witness or deponent to tell his side of the story on the illegal immigrants and project IC.

The demand to remove Tan Sri Herman Luping is only the first of a series of revelations to be issued by Bersih Sabah in the next coming weeks.

Bersih Sabah will be issuing on Wednesday the next statement, this time on KY Mustafa, who was the state of secretary from 24th April 2000 until 2nd July 2007, and succeeded by Datuk Seri Panglima Sukarti Wakiman, who assumed office on 3rd July 2007.

29 comments:

  1. Herman Luping mempunyai pencapaian amat baik, dia layak menjadi panel RCI.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Berdasarkan pengalaman dan jasa TS Herman selama ini, beliau layak menjadi panel RCI. Tanggungjawab ini amat berat dan mereka yang berpengalaman saja mampu pikul tugas ini.

      Delete
    2. panel yang dipilih pasti ada kebolehan yang baik sebab itu mereka dipilih.

      Delete
  2. Kenapa ada pihak yang meragui Herman Luping. Beliau rasanya layak untuk dipilih menjadi panel. Saya sokong apa KILI cakap itu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Atama saja yang komplen pasal ni. Dia saja yang tidak puas hati.

      Delete
    2. Atama is desperate for attention.

      Delete
    3. ini sengaja dimainkan untuk dapatkan perhatian.

      Delete
  3. Herman Luping is not found guilty for his case. Why want to speculate it again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pemilihan calon panel harus teliti dan bebas dari corruption

      Delete
    2. sesetengah pekara dimainkan untuk jadi terkenal.

      Delete
    3. Panel harus diberi kuasa sepenuhnya untuk menjalankan tugasnya.

      Delete
  4. Herman Luping praises Musa's financial management as it rated the best in the nation with undergoing rapid development. He even says that Musa has introduced a blueprint on a strategic state development agenda called Halatuju which has propelled the 3 sectors throughout the years.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sekiranya ramai Sabahans tidak berpuas hati mungkin perlu ada kajian semula.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What is wrong assigning Herman if he is qualified?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mungkin atama mahu jadi panel dalam RCI?

      Delete
  7. He has qualified to be a panel of RCI.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is advisable to be very careful while choosing candidates for RCI panel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True and free from all sort of accusations and corruption.

      Delete
  9. Should there be a need for review?

    ReplyDelete
  10. bersih ni dari dulu hanya tahu membantah saja.

    ReplyDelete
  11. mantap sangat ka kredibiliti si Atama sampai tanpa segan silu mempertikaikan kredibiliti pihak lain??

    ReplyDelete
  12. jika Atama mahu mempertikaikan kredibiliti Herman Luping yang ditugaskan untuk menganggotai RCI, kenapa dia tidak pertikaikan sekali kredibiliti Anwar, Yong Teck Lee dan Jeffrey yang berhasrat mahu merampas jawatan KM dan PM?? latar belakang mereka tidaklah bersih sangat, malah lebih teruk dari Herman Luping..

    ReplyDelete
  13. walau apapun kritikan yang dilemparkan sesetengah pihak berkenaan dengan terma atau panel RCI, bagi saya RCI tetap pilihan yang terbaik.. kalau mahu menghukum RCI, biarlah selepas siasatan habis dilaksanakan..

    ReplyDelete
  14. Harap Herman sudah mempelajari apa dari kesilapan yang dilakukan oleh beliau di masa lalu.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Pasti ada sebab kukuh kenapa beliau tersenarai dlam RCI.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Pemilihan panel adalah melalui process yang berperingkat rasanya.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lets wait another 6 months whether the RCI work well to address the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Hoping the panel can work freely without any control by the government.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Rakyat menaruh harapan terhadap RCI. Harap kesemua siasatan yang dijalankan dapat menghasilkan hasil yang positif.

    ReplyDelete

Search This Blog