KOTA KINABALU: The manifesto revealed by the Sabah
Progressive Party (Sapp) on Sun in the Sabah capital, to cite an example, leaves
a lot to be desired since its conveys the impression that “the party leaders
continue to be in a state of denial and are sitting on another planet and
making plans for the state”.
This
is the dismissive note, albeit reluctantly, from the State Reform Party (Star)
on the Sapp Manifesto unveiled amidst much fanfare. The party hopes that others
in the opposition will take heed of the lessons and do a better job on their
respective manifestos “while Sapp goes back to the drawing board”.
“Opposition
parties in Sabah including the parti parti Malaya should not hope to emulate
the evil being perpetrated by the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) when announcing
their respective party manifestos,” said Star vice chairman Dr Felix Chong who
until recently was with the Democratic Action Party (Dap). “Enough is enough.
Let’s not play the game by the rules that the BN has drawn up.”
Chong
was making comparisons between the Sapp Manifesto and the guiding principles
driving the proposed Star Manifesto “which will be unveiled at an appropriate
time”.
For
starters, said Chong, he doesn’t know what is the vision and mission driving
the Sapp Manifesto and this is evident in the absence of macro elements despite
paying lip service, in passing, to autonomy and the one country, two systems
approach.
In
contrast, he added, Star has already mapped out its vision, mission,
objectives, goals and activities (vimoga) “and all these will be reflected in
the content of the party manifesto”. In addition, the Star manifesto will take
due recognition of the vimoga of the Borneo Agenda driven-United Borneo Alliance (UBA) of which
Star is the founding member and lead partner.
Asked
what the fundamental flaw was, if any, in the Sapp Manifesto, Chong said it was
“an inability to see the forest for the trees’ and “this is evident in the
over-emphasis on micro aspects”.
“It
would seem that Sapp leaders, in drawing up their Manifesto, are counting their
chickens before they are hatched in putting the cart before the horse,” said
Chong. “The Sapp Manifesto was dead even before it hit the water because it’s
littered with useless and undemocratic ideas like the anti-hop law which is a
non-starter.”
Holding
out an olive branch, Chong suggested that all opposition parties in Sabah and
Sarawak “including the unwelcome parti parti Malaya”
get together and thrash out the macro aspects which should resonate through
their respective manifestos and drive it together with their individual vimoga.
Chong
said that there must be a consensus among opposition parties in the two Borneo states on three key drivers:
(1)
remove
the element of fear from politics – “reflected in the dependency syndrome” -- and crush it by building strength through
unity of the political parties and the people;
(2)
take
a pledge that Putrajaya should reverse the internal colonization policies in
Sabah and Sarawak which, admittedly, “are
being facilitated by local traitors who are willing to be proxies and stooges
of the ruling party”;
(3)
regain/restore
the self-determination status of 31 Aug 1963 for Sabah and 22 July 1963 for
Sarawak which (the status) became dormant on 16 Sept 1963 after both states
were misled by the “cunning” Malayans and “re-colonizing” British into agreeing
to help form and participate in the Federation of Malaysia, a bad idea from
London.
“These three aspects are absolutely crucial and in fact must
drive all local parties – “including the parti parti Malaya since they have
local members” -- in Sabah and Sarawak across both sides of the political
divide,” said Chong. “Hopefully, the parti parti Malaya in Sabah and Sarawak are not here to emulate the self-serving and evil
politics of the proxies and stooges of the ruling Federal party.”
Elaborating on the self-determination theme, Chong
acknowledged that it could be left on the back-burner “until 2020” if Putrajaya
complied with the four constitutional documents and/or conventions which formed
the basis for Sabah and Sarawak’s participation in Malaysia viz. the 1963
Malaysia Agreement (MA63); the 20/18 Points (20/18 P); the Inter Governmental
Committee Report (IGCR); and the Cobbold omission report (CCR).
“It’s the non-compliance which eventually led to the
internal colonization policies being pursued by Putrajaya in Sabah and Sarawak,” said Chong. “The internal colonization can be
seen in a host of issues ranged between the ketuanan Melayu concept on one hand
and the grinding poverty of our two states on the other hand.”
The Star vice chairman denied that his party and the UBA were
biting off more than what they can chew. In a rebuttal, he pointed out that
“the purpose of politics was to re-distribute political power and re-distribute
resources”.
“If we are going to achieve these twin objectives of
politics – power and resources – we need to get our politics and relationships
right and not continue be caught in a slave mindset,” said Chong. “Otherwise,
we have no business being in politics.”
Asked about the 17 Points in the Sapp Manifesto, Chong said
that first things must be done first and, in other things, “we can cross the
bridge when we come to it”.
He recalled that Umno, together with the Sapp breakaway from
the Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS), promised a “Sabah Baru within 100 days” back in
1994, and the people were still waiting for it to materialize 18 years later.
So, Sapp has a “credibility issue” on its 17 Points, he added.
“The failure of Sabah Baru to materialize eventually forced the
United Sabah National Organisation members in Umno to leave the party and they have
joined us in UBA,” said Chong. “They will contest under the Star symbol pending
the re-registration of their party.”
kesian c Jambun...matcam kecewa dia ini! Bah!...Tunggu apa lagi, bikinlah kau punya bintang bah!
ReplyDelete