Top posts

Featured Posts

No indications Jeffrey is a game-changer

By Joe Fernandez
State Reform Party (Star) chairman Jeffrey Kitingan is once again in the news for the wrong reasons. He has stirred a hornet’s nest in Sabah by claiming that all politicians in Sabah, including his brother Joseph Pairin Kitingan, are frogs.

He thinks that this will explain him being discredited time and again by Sabahans as the King of Frogs. Jeffrey has, by most counts, moved through as many as six political parties but all this is water under the bridge and for the most part irrelevant.

His considered opinion is that other politicians continued their political frogging until they secured a comfort zone for themselves, albeit “at the expense of the people”.

In his case, according to him, he continued frogging until he could find a political vehicle which could accept his “struggle for the people”. 

Of course, there’s the little matter of him not finding any political vehicle for his struggle until he set up Star. This begs the question of why he didn’t make such a move earlier.

Jeffrey’s comments on other political frogs have been dismissed by them as completely untrue. They claim to be struggling for the people too – by “bringing development to them” – instead of focusing on whatever Jeffrey is preaching all the time.

So far, it has all been needless indulgence in the politics of distraction and disruption from the real issues of the day. No doubt politicians in Sabah love the sound of their own voices.

The Star chairman obviously feels that “man does not live by bread alone”.

“What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but suffers the loss of his own soul?” asks Star deputy chairman Daniel John Jambun rhetorically. “This is the thrust of our struggle.”

Daniel may have a point about struggling for the soul of Sabah -- i.e. to save it and obviously from the clutches of Peninsular Malaysia and their local proxies and their stooges -- but that’s about as far as it goes.

His boss seems to be squatting so far on the so-called struggle for the people.

He has blown hot and cold on Daniel John and Co internationalizing the struggle for Borneo in Malaysia.

Therein lies an emerging split in Star which will either see Jeffrey being ousted from his own party or many Supreme Council members leaving for the Parti Cinta Sabah (PCS) which has been approved in principle in recent weeks. The party is awaiting its registration certificate. PCS plans to join the Star-initiated, formed and led United Borneo Alliance (UBA).

The proof of the pudding is in the eating.

Jeffrey has confined himself thus far in his ceramah to explaining the history of Sabah before and in Malaysia. No one can fault him here since not many people, especially the younger generation, are conversant with the historical facts.

But the movement for Sabah does not seem to be moving from rhetoric to action.

To digress a little, the younger generation doesn’t seem to be too bothered by Sabah’s history in Malaysia.

Instead, they have cut the Gordian knot and are asking why Sabah should be in Malaysia at all.

Their logic is simple: Peninsular Malaysia is so far away, we can’t even breathe without their permission, and “why are we in Federation with them especially since we can be on our own?”

Others ask: “How did we get into this situation and how do we get out?”

Jeffrey has no answers and it would be foolhardy for anyone, judging from his politics since 1984, to look to him.

True, he did lead a rowdy Star crowd to greet Prime Minister Mohd Najib Abdul Razak on his recent visit to Keningau where he (Najib) announced a quarter billion ringgit loan to Sabah for a water treatment plant.

They had placards reading “Sabah’s independence” and castigating Putrajaya for behaving like an Ah Long (loan shark) with Sabah after seizing almost all its revenue for itself. 

This is the first time that Jeffrey has been associated with “Sabah’s independence”. No one is sure what it means. So, the excitement was lacking.

It would have been different had Jeffrey stated in no uncertain terms that Malaysia has ceased to exist following the Federal Government’s non-compliance on the five constitutional documents and/or constitutional conventions on Malaysia i.e. the 1963 Malaysia Agreement (MA63), the Three-Point Oath Stone (Batu Sumpah) witnessed and solemnized by the Federal Government in Keningau, the 20/18 Points, the Inter Governmental Committee Report and the Cobbold Commission Report.

Non-compliance ipso facto meant that Sabah’s self-determination of 31 Aug 1963 (Sarawak 22 July 1963) remains undiminished.

Jeffrey lost a golden opportunity in Keningau to say what he meant and mean what he said.

In any case, he appears to be no messiah for his flock.

The thrust of his complaints thus far has been that the Federal Government has been in non-compliance on MA63. He wants Putrajaya to set up a compliance mechanism.
This is unlikely to happen as MA63 has ceased to exist by virtue of non-compliance but Jeffrey refuses to accept this and continues to flog the proverbial dead horse on a compliance mechanism.

Not surprising he has been accused by no less than former Sabah Chief Minister Harris Salleh of seriously misleading the people with his propaganda barrage on a compliance mechanism. Harris claims that MA63 – and the four other constitutional documents and/or constitutional conventions – “has been overtaken by events”. This is euphemism for non-compliance. However, Harris dreads and avoids the term non-compliance.

Jeffrey’s politics also glosses over the fact that Sabahans are by no means united on being out of Malaysia or even in Malaysia.

Putrajaya has done a very successful job since 1963 of pitting the people in the state against each other, introducing polarisation a la Peninsular Malaysia, and ensuring proxy control of the politics of the state.

The political situation has been further compounded by the influx of illegal immigrants who have over the years allegedly found their way into the electoral rolls.

These illegals see Putrajaya and Malaysia as the best guarantee of their continued existence in Sabah.

Local Muslims see the illegals as being in the state particularly at their expense, further marginalizing and disenfranchising them as the opportunities that should go to them dwindle even further.

Jeffrey is yet to bridge the non-Muslim-local Muslim disconnect created by Putrajaya over nearly five decades. So far, only some of the Dusuns including Muslims and Muruts are with him. The same goes for the Suluks, Brunei Muslims and Chinese. He has hardly any support among the Bajau and Irranun.

The Chinese appear caught between the Orang Asal (Natives) – the Murut and the Dusuns including the Kadazan or urban Dusun – the local Muslims and the illegals.

Jeffrey will be no game-changer unless he can get his act together and help forge total unity among Sabahans i.e. Orang Asal and the others alike to take on the illegals allegedly on the electoral rolls.

Charity begins at home.

Getting his act together would first mean setting his own house in order.

There are growing complaints that Star is a one-man show with little evidence of democracy in action, unrepresentative, and no empowerment of the leadership and members.

Jeffrey’s aides seem to be more powerful than even the party’s three deputy chairmen. The aides have since prevailed on their boss to issue a gag order on anyone other than Jeffrey issuing press statements. These statements are invariably written by the aides.

The party has also yet to reveal its vision, mission, objectives, goals and activities although there’s a draft prepared by several Supreme Council members. The draft has reportedly been dismissed by Jeffrey’s aides as “spin and bullshit”.

The oft-cited party Manifesto, again provided by several Supreme Council members in draft form, has been allowed to gather dust on the shelf by Jeffrey’s aides on the grounds that it was not written by their boss, “it was just spin and bullshit”, and that “Star (meaning Jeffrey’s aides) has its own way of doing things”.

It appears to be clear to many that if the two respective drafts can be “rejected”, then Jeffrey is clearly no game-changer and can be discounted from the emerging political equation in Sabah and Malaysia.

47 comments:

  1. Sad, sad story penned by you Mr. Fernandez. Can you give an alternative to Dr. J, please? Minus taking Sabah out of Malaysia of course, as suggested by you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bacalah "Joe Fernandez is a liar" di Wikisabah.
      Mana bole dipercaya.

      Delete
    2. As far as I concerned, Sabah has changed a lot since colonization era.

      Delete
    3. Apa yang penting ialah Sabah telah mencapai kejayaan yang amat ketara.

      Delete
    4. Ya, betul.
      Pencapaian dan kejayaan yang paling cermerlang dan ketara adalah SABAH NEGERI TERMISKIN DI MALAYSIA.
      Hasil cukai Rm22.7 bilion dipunggut oleh kerajaan pusat dan RM15.0 bilion setahun dipunggut oleh Petronas.

      Delete
  2. Jeffrey Kitingan has so far been No Action Talk Only (NATO). If he wants to be taken seriously, he should stop talking and reveal his action plans to regain Sabah, Sarawak rights. The suspicion is that Jeffrey is only interested in using the issue of the rights of Borneo in Malaysia just to gather votes.

    I know Jeffrey and Daniel John and the other activists. Daniel is planning to stand in Inanam which is my area.

    It's better for those in Star who want action to move to the Parti Cinta Sabah.

    Star can continue to be a one-man show talking until the cows come home.

    PCS should spring into action on the issue of Sabah rights.

    Since Jeffrey is not acting against his aides who was kurang ajar to Daniel and the other senior leaders, they shouldn't hang around in a party which doesn't respect and value them.

    Perhaps Jeffrey thinks that Star is his grandfather's party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, he is good in lip service.

      Delete
  3. We want YB Eric in Inanam.
    Daniel will lose his deposit this time.
    Sapp boleh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just wait for the general election. We will see who will lose and who will win.

      Delete
    2. Macam SAPP tu kuat sangat. Cakap je pandai.

      Delete
    3. SAPP kasi cukup forum saja.

      Delete
    4. tiada peluang SAPP menang nanti...

      Delete
  4. PKR said Jeffrey cannot speak for Sabah and he has no right to claim they represented Borneo through his Borneo Agenda.

    http://wikisabah.blogspot.com/2012/06/jeffrey-cannot-claim-to-speak-for.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. However Star also fight back saying that the people did not give mandate to PKR to write Sabah's Orang Book. From the way the opposition parties fight against each other, it is unlikely they can become game-changer.

      Delete
    2. So, how is the plan to make a cooperation between PKR and STAR in the next GE if the situation is like this?

      Delete
    3. ..I mean to get one to one fight.

      Delete
    4. Now even Pakatan is getting wet with Jeff so how was that? Going down dirty?

      Delete
    5. PKR pun tiada peluang menang di sabah...

      Delete
  5. People know very well who is actually the real Frog.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I hope the politician can fix their aim and not going to jump ship again and again.

    ReplyDelete
  7. parti2 pembangkang di Sabah mmg tiada persefahaman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bukan saja tiada persefahaman malah masing2 tamak untuk berkuasa...

      Delete
  8. Jeffrey harus ada pendirian dalam perjuangannya. bukan bertukar-tukar parti.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If it is true what joe fernandez wrote here then dr jefrey kitingan must really do some introspection on himself and his style of leadership.. i dont see jefrey team, so why must only him be allowed to make press statement ? dictatorial style is unwelcome in this age, dr jefrey must be reminded ..

    Embrace openes and empower your leftenants, that is the way forward..

    ReplyDelete
  10. If Star contest 60 seats and won 2 seats only, what's the point?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Star won't win any seats...

      Delete
    2. Tanpa kerjasama antara pihak pembangkang, semua undi rakyat akan berpecah-pecah. Tidak mungkin parti pembangkang boleh menang, percayalah.

      Delete
  11. Daniel John has just tendered his resignation from Star.
    With Joe Fernandez as adviser, Daniel will be contesting in Inanam and Sepanggar and Joe F. is also considering contesting himself against YTL.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Really? Daniel resigned frm Star ? Hmm what a loss.. more will leave if Star doesnt shape up !

      Delete
    2. Daniel is irrelevant in STAR and has contributed nothing.
      Other pejuang-pejuang in Star are young, talented, capable and truly committed to fight for Sabah's rights and future.

      Delete
    3. Saya dengar kawan saya bilang Daniel bukan sja tidak bantu Star.
      Miting Star Daniel pun jarang hadir.
      Hanya si Joe yang buduh sja yang angkat Daneil.
      Mereka dua ini tidak berprinsip dan tidak tahu malu.

      Delete
    4. Daniel pun tidak lagi memberi sokongan kepada Star, mungkin parti ini bermasalah.

      Delete
    5. Daniel yang bermasalah bukan Star.
      Turun padang tinguk betul2 kekuatan dan sokongan Star.
      Tinguk betul2 pejuang2 Star yang lain, hebat mereka.
      Daniel ular mcm penulis India.

      Delete
  12. Hanya rakyat saja yang boleh menentukan sama ada mereka percayakan Jeffrey ataupun tidak.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. setiap orang pasti ada pandangan sendiri terhadap Jeffrey.

      Delete
    2. rakyat pasti sudah kenal dan tahu rekod JK sebelum ini.

      Delete
  13. Writing like talking with big fart.
    Who has betrayed Sabah?
    JK or the current leaders in Umno/BN?
    Stupid writer can't see who is in the wrong.
    Only know how to hentam JK.
    Only know how to hentam opposition to benefit Umno/BN.
    Who has done more damage to Sabah?
    JK and opposition or Umno/BN and Umno/BN leaders?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yang terpenting, perjuangan STAR untuk mengembalikan hak-hak Sabah yang dihakis sejak 1963.
    Sabah adalah 1 drpd 3 rakan kongsi sama-rata dan sama-taraf dengan Malaya dan Sarawak.
    Sabah bukan 1 drpd 13 negeri seperti Perlis dll.
    Keluasan Sabah sama dgn 90 kali keluasan Perlis.
    Adilkah minyak keluar dari bumi Sabah hanya dapat 5% dan 95% diambil oleh Petronas. Kenapa harga minyak sama dgn Semenanjung dan tidak murah seperti Brunei.
    Subsidi gas yang dikeluarkan oleh Sabah dan Sarawak kepada pengeluar letrik di Malaya adalah RM19 bilion setahun. Sabah dan Sarawak dapat 0 sen subsidi setahun. Pengguna letrik di Malaya bayar kadar letrik dengan kadar yang jual lebih murah daripada pengguna letrik di Sabah dan Sarawak.
    Sabah negeri termiskin di Malaysia.
    Ngam kah semua itu?
    Kita mau Sabah kekal termiskin dan 1 drpd 13 negeri atau Sabah kaya-raya, maju dan makmur sebagai 1 drpd 3 rakan kongsi sama-rata dan sama-taraf dgn Malaya dan Sarawak?
    Fikir2kan lah.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreemant Malaysia yang ditandatangani dokumennya di London, perlu melaksanakan Akta Malaysia untuk menubuhkan Kerajaan Malaysia ketika itu.

      Perkara ini telah dimasukkan di dalam artikel 1: Iaitu artikel ini menerangkan bahawa negeri2 yang terlibat dalam Persekutuan Malaya, Singapura, Sabah dan Sarawak setaraf dengan negeri2 di dalam Malaysia.

      Ini menunjukkan bahawa Sabah, Sarawak dan negeri2 di dalam Persekutuan Malaya dan Singapura adalah satu kompenan negeri di dalam Malaysia. Kenyataan pihak pembangkang yang menyatakan Sabah adalah sama taraf dengan Kerajaan Malaysia adalah tidak benar sama sekali dan menyalahi perlembagaan dalam Akta Penubuhan Malaysia.

      Borneo Paradise (Blog)
      Borneo Paradise (Facebook)

      Delete
    2. berkenaan dengan Minyak pula;

      Daripada 100% hasil minyak, 5% akan diserahkan kepada Kerajaan Negeri, 5% lagi diserahkan kepada Kerajaan Persekutuan, 30% untuk syarikat minyak nasional, manakala 60% diambil untuk kos carigali minyak.

      Itu merupakan prosedur yang digunakan di seluruh dunia dan termakhtub dalam perjanjian antara Kerajaan Persekutuan dengan Kerajaan Negeri atau Residensi di mana-mana bahagian di dunia ini.

      Borneo Paradise (Blog)
      Borneo Paradise (Facebook)

      Delete
  15. SAPP tidak dapat buat apa-apa sudah itu. Itu pasal macam tidak ketentuan sudah SAPP.

    ReplyDelete
  16. masih lagi tidak bersatu parti pembangkang ni.

    ReplyDelete
  17. parti-parti pembangkang di Sabah masih belum mendapat kesepakatan dikalangan mereka.

    ReplyDelete
  18. rakyat pasti tahu siapa yang selama ini berkhidmar untuk mereka.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. kalau mahu tanya siapa yang berkhidmat, mestilah pemimpin2 kerajaan.. pemimpin2 pembangkang hanya kehulu kehilir minta rakyat menggulingkan kerajaan..

      Delete
  19. macam mana sekalipun, pemimpin katak seperti JK tidak layak diangkat sebagai ketua menteri atau perdana menteri sabah..

    ReplyDelete

Search This Blog